<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Deleted Theory &#187; New Found Respect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deletedtheory.com/category/new-found-respect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deletedtheory.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:38:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Passing around some new found respect // QA Testers</title>
		<link>http://deletedtheory.com/2008/06/passing-around-some-new-found-respect-qa-testers/</link>
		<comments>http://deletedtheory.com/2008/06/passing-around-some-new-found-respect-qa-testers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>viller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Found Respect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Assurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deletedtheory.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About a month ago a friend of mine named Peter Childs wrote an insightful blog post called Learning to Code, in which Peter describes what it is like to jump into a developer&#8217;s shoes. Peter has plenty of experience working with software developers, but this is the first time that he has coded a website [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About a month ago a friend of mine named Peter Childs wrote an insightful blog post called <a title="http://petesview.net/2008/05/09/learning-to-code/" href="http://" target="_blank">Learning to Code</a>, in which Peter describes what it is like to jump into a developer&#8217;s shoes. Peter has plenty of experience working with software developers, but this is the first time that he has coded a website all by himself. He is not limited by ideas or expectations, in fact he has plenty of both. So for Peter, a simple word press &amp; theme just wont do.  He envisions web 2.0 with all the fixins &amp; media. He has been adapting and coding his ideas for a few months, and Peter has found out that with code, the devil is in the details.</p>
<p>My favorite part of his post is the end where Peter states,</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh! And to all those programmers that I antagonized by asking “how hard can it be” when some business pressure meant a 90 degree turn in code – I apologize. I now know software happens at the level of details not concepts.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have worked on a few projects with Peter, and he should rest assured that he is not the only one to have suggested a 90 degree turn in code.  Also, Peter should know that his revelation will offer coders insight on how our non-coding coworkers view software development.  I now know to simply remind my requirement suppliers that the details are not as flexible as the concepts.</p>
<p>However; The point of Peter&#8217;s post is a little broader than the coder/business dynamic.  Peter has shared some new found respect, and I feel that I have had an experience in which I can do the same.  For the past few days I have been dedicated full time on web app QA and managing our bug system.   It has been a race to the finish line, and the other developers are working very hard to deliver top quality which I must somehow measure.  I realize how challenging it is to be the QA gatekeeper for a team of developers.  Every feature and change requires me to race to complete a number of feature and regression tests. [And don't forget about cross browser testing.]  This task takes great patience, attention span and a tedious amount of concentration.  Furthermore, it doesn&#8217;t take very long to realize that programmers will loose their appreciation.  It starts off warm and fuzzy as you save their behinds, but after sending a bug back for the fourth time the programmers no longer feel like sharing the love.</p>
<p>So, in the spirit of Peter&#8217;s post&#8230;  To all those QA tester&#8217;s to whom I have passed incomplete features or have forced to regression test immediately before a deadline &#8211; I apologize.   I now know that the assurance of quality stems from meticulous attention to detail and a rigourous amount of searching, testing, and reporting.  You have saved my butt on more than one occasion, and the nature of software QA means that only you and I will every know about the bugs we killed immediately before release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deletedtheory.com/2008/06/passing-around-some-new-found-respect-qa-testers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
